Monday, January 9, 2017

The 10 Dumbest Mistakes - Part Five

As a reminder, we are going through my notes from the book The 10 Dumbest Mistakes Smart People Make and How to Avoid Them. The reason for doing this is very simple. If we want to increase our effectiveness, we need to reduce our mistakes 😊

Chapter Eight – Comparisonitis

There comes a day when the queen asks the mirror: “Who is the fairest of them all?” and the mirror has to inform the queen that she has been displaced.

The suffix -itis means “inflammation.”

Comparisons function as a point of reference, as a means of bringing order out of chaos … Comparing allows us to put things in a context.

By and large, negative comparisons cause the most grief

More often than not, you probably compare yourself to those who seem to have more.

You might wish to be “as thin as Jane Fonda.” Or, you might compare status and awards.

Death is a drastic solution to the problem, of course, but it is often difficult to come to terms with changes in your life that make you feel less than you were before.

Comparisons provides the plot for the movie classic It's a Wonderful Life.

We have already talked about dealing with the criticisms of others in an earlier chapter. Negative comparing is just another form of criticism. The critical issue is whether you internalize their comparison and make it your own.

It's only natural to prefer to be compared favorably to others. Advertisers take advantage of this desire.

You can often turn a disadvantage to an advantage. Psychiatrist Alfred Adler argued that the human striving for superiority is one of the prime motivating forces in life.

Adler stressed the importance of role models, people you believe are superior. He felt that the desire to be more like those people motivates you to grow and learn.

Many accomplished people tell of being motivated to succeed in order to show people who said: “You don't have what it takes.”

Yes, comparisons can be useful tools to prod, motivate, move, and inspire. But they can also be used with great effectiveness to destroy … Depending on how you take them, negative comparisons can damage your self-confidence and warp your judgment.

You know how you are affected. When you compare yourself to some specific other person, or to your past, or to your dream, does it make you more determined to succeed, or does it seem only to discourage you? … Do you say to yourself, “If he can do it, I can do it too,” or does it bring on a bout of jealousy.

One of the most common results of companionitis is giving up.

Alfred Adler contended that people who have a need to diminish others in order to look good themselves suffer from an overinflated inferiority complex.

The urge to keep up with the Joneses, to be seen by others as equally prosperous or brave or smart or whatever, gets a great many people into trouble.

The first step to curing the pain of companionitis is to weed out companions that are simply wrong. To do this, you must ask yourself a series of question:
What are you comparing?
How accurate is your companion?
Are you drawing conclusions about all of that person's life based on the one fact you are sure of?
When you make your companion, do you chalk up every positive that exists on the other side but ignore any positive on your own side? Do you fairly tote up the negatives on both sides of your companion?
Do you confuse “getting there” with “being there”?

There are pluses and minuses to every choice and, to make a fair companion, you need to include all of them?

What meaningful difference does your companion make?

Oprah Winfrey has said that she realized she was not as pretty as many of her classmates, and getting by on looks was not going to be a good plan for her.

Superexaggeration is a good technique to use in companionitis. That means deliberately exaggerating your comparison.

You can go one step at a time.

A lot of us define ourselves by our work. Be careful. You can go too far.

The greatest barrier to solving problems is not failing to come up with a solution, it is coming up with a single solution and stopping there.

Here's a helpful hint when doing comparison: Don't just compare two ways (alternative A vs. alternative B), compare four ways. Here's how that works: Take two pieces of paper and draw a line down the middle of each. The heading of one will be the advantages and disadvantages of alternative A. The heading of the second will be the advantages and disadvantages of alternative B.

You will never stop making comparisons, and of course you don't want to give up those comparisons that are helpful. But you may find that your life becomes more comfortable if you simply start comparing less – and less often.

Chapter Nine – What-If Thinking

The what-if person is similar to Chicken Little in that both can clearly see a catastrophe that hasn't happened … The what-if person doesn't claim anything terrible has happened, but focuses attention on the fact that it could happen.

What-if questions make you feel vulnerable and exposed.

What-if thinking is paralyzing.

What-if people find it difficult to take risks because the potential dangers of failure loom so much larger than the potential gains of success.

Although bad things do happen, it is demonstrably, statistically true that they do not happen as often as we worry about them happening. And the things we worry about often turn out to be nowhere near as serious as we feared, or we can handle the problem more easily than we thought.

Here is an example of how emotional thoughts can runaway and snowball. One married man felt tremendous guilt and fear after kissing and fondling his secretary. He worried, “What if she becomes pregnant?” Here's the thing, the man knew full-well his secretary had had a hysterectomy. What's more, the two had not engaged in intercourse. So goes emotionality. When the mind starts to race, it can take on a mind of its own. Here's the big kicker, the man was a biology professor! There's the thing, knowing better will not necessarily prevent a mistake in thinking.

What-if thinking can work like this. A tree branch, moved by the wind, raps against a window in your home. Your mind starts racing, “What if it is a burglar?” And, you become terrified.

To be flawed, a premise does not have to be impossible, but simply not very likely.

Let's say you apply for a job at a TV station. And, your minds starts to race, “What if the station manager thinks I am foolish for daring to apply for this job? And what if he jokes about me to others at the station? What if he tells my present boss that I applied? What if my boss then gets angry and fires me? What if....?”

What-if behavior is simply another means we use for focusing on the negative rather than the positive, for talking ourselves into being more miserable rather than talking ourselves out of being miserable and into feeling more confident.

Pretty soon it is hard to tell where what-if leaves off and the Chicken Little syndrome with its accompanying all-is-lost feeling begins.

Many people put off seeing the doctor about some symptom that concerns them because they are worried that their worst fears will be confirmed.

What-if thinking clearly is not a mistake when it is used to spur the imagination toward envisioning options or preparing for a challenge.

Worry is a very individual matter. Some people are scared to fly. As it happens, there are more deaths more automobile crashes than from airplane crashes.

Tom is undeniably brave. Yet he becomes tongue-tied at the thought of confronting his wife with his anger about her methods of disciplining the children. “What if she leaves me? What if I never see our children again? What if....?”

Just as you can talk yourself into worrying more, you can talk yourself into worrying less.

If you are determined to worry as long as there is even one chance in a zillion that what you fear will happen, you are building a prison cell in which to confine yourself.

The most important question you must ask about what-if thinking is whether it helps you or hurts you … Ask yourself whether by avoiding certain risks you are actually creating greater risks to your health, your career potential, or your future happiness in general.

Questioning your evidence is important in dealing with all mistakes in thinking.

The very act of questioning a what-if scenario slows down the automatic process that escalates tension, builds fear, deepens worry, and immobilizes the thinker.

You can go from one physician to the next, never believing anyone who gives you a diagnosis that you are fine – if, that is, you combine perfectionism with what-if thinking and demand a statistical certainty of zero.

If questioning the evidence doesn't resolve your worries, you can try to interrupt your what-if thoughts by means of a diversion (This is the Distraction I have previously discussed on this blog)

Instead of simply repeating these thoughts over and over in your mind, get the answers … If you are worried about whether there is a hospital to treat a condition you have, find out, and put your mind at rest.

You could also divert your mind with a relaxation technique.

Another very useful technique when your thoughts are making you miserable is to schedule a specific time to let those miserable thoughts out, and then refuse to allow them to intrude at any other time of the day or night. This is much easier to do than most people think.

You can treat your need to worry the same way you treat your need to do the laundry, mow the lawn, or see your dentist. You make time for it.

If you have too many things to do, worrying around the clock cannot help you get those things done, because worrying makes everything harder to do.

Schedule things that you like, that you might have put off. Why? Because your what-if thinking can create a feeling that there is nothing you can enjoy now, or ever.

You can schedule time to prepare for the problem you fear, just in case it does arrive.

Scheduled activities can get you moving when what-if thinking has stopped you cold.