I
have said it once. I will say it a thousand times. There are two, and
only two, entrepreneurial functions. They are innovation and
marketing. For more information, click here and read an earlier post.
Of
course, I was not the person to first identify the two entrepreneurial
functions. That credit belongs to Peter Drucker. However, I do have
one bone to pick with Mr. Drucker.
Actually,
it is not a bone to pick. It is a matter of clarification. It is a
matter of semantics. I prefer to use the word “selling” instead
of “marketing.”
The
problem arises from the definition of selling versus marketing. What
Drucker called “selling” I would label “peddling.” In either
case, what Drucker and I are talking about is convincing people to
buy the products you have produced. The alternative would be to produce things people want and freely chose to buy.
Drucker
would say that selling focuses on the needs of the seller, while
marketing focuses on the needs of the buyer. I understand what he
means. But, what about consultative selling?
The
fact is, it is completely possible for a salesperson to focus on the
needs of the customer. In fact, lots of salespeople already do it.
Whether you call it “consultative selling” or “solution
selling,” what we are talking about is needs-based selling. And,
needs-based selling fits Drucker's definition of “marketing.”
Last week I asked the question, “What do you sell?” Now, we should
turn our attention to how we sell. But, before we do that, I would
like to draw your attention to the power of professional selling. This is important because, again, selling is one of the two main functions in business/entrepreneurship.
As
we all know, the economy collapsed a few years ago. One question that
pops up is can we start, or expand, our companies in a weak economy? The answer
is yes. But, we need to do it right. We need to listen to Drucker and
focus on the needs of the customer.
Focusing
on the needs of the customer is what consultative sellers do. One of
my favorite consultative sellers is a gentleman by the name of Mark
Roberge.
Roberge
is the Chief Revenue Officer at a company called HubSpot. The
innovation, which HubSpot brought to the market, is inbound
marketing. And, due to their excellent salesforce, the company was
able to grow, even during the recession. And, I do not mean grow a little...
Weak economies are, actually, a good time to expand because everybody else has chosen to contract. Back
in February, Roberge published an article in the Harvard Business
Review. The article was titled, “A Recession Doesn't Mean Your
Startup Can't Grow.”
I
think Mark's story is great. As was the article. And, since I want to highlight the
importance of a good sales process, I have decided to pass it along
to you. Here are the contents of Mark's HBR article:
So
far this year, the stock market has been anything but stable. The
correction for tech companies appears to be well underway.
Instability overseas continues, causing rising concerns about the
effect on the global economy. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve finds
it difficult to commit to a plan for 2016.
If
the economy continues to head south, what does it mean for
entrepreneurs ready to scale their business? Should they hold off on
growing sales? Should they take a more conservative approach?
My
answer is no.
In
my view, a down economy is the best time to build a sales team. In
fact, I lived through the journey to tell the tale. I joined HubSpot,
an inbound marketing software company, as the fourth employee and
first salesperson in 2007. My role was to scale the sales team.
Within a year, we had scaled from 100 customers to 700 customers. We
had dozens of employees and a dozen or so salespeople. With $17
million in venture capital, we were ready to accelerate sales hiring
even further. Life was good.
Then
came October of 2008, the worst financial meltdown in decades. As an
executive team, we were rattled. Would budget freezes slow down
sales? Would future funding options dry up? Would we need to lay
people off? Would our dreams of building “the next big thing” be
foiled by circumstances outside of our control?
To
my surprise, things did not slow down. We were able to secure our
next round of funding. We accelerated our pace of sales hiring. Seven
years after that infamous day in 2008, we are a post-IPO company with
a market cap of over $1 billion dollars.
Looking
back, the 2008 economic downturn may have helped us more than it hurt
us. Here are five reasons why:
High
availability of talent. The “war on talent” has been a hot
topic over the past few years. Attracting top caliber people into an
early stage venture is arguably one of the most important tasks for
the founding team. These early hires will figure out the business
model, establish the culture, and ultimately recruit the next wave of
employees to drive the business forward.
From
the perspective of talent availability, the HubSpot sales team
benefited immensely from the 2008 financial crisis. Within months of
the market crash, layoffs at other companies yielded a sudden spike
in available sales talent. The salespeople that lost their jobs were
not necessarily the bottom of the barrel, either. In many cases, they
were simply in the wrong division working on the wrong product at the
wrong time.
As
we continued to expand the sales team post crisis, the increased
talent pool enabled us to raised the bar on the quality of
salespeople we hired. These new hires went on to play crucial roles
in developing our sales playbook and hiring and developing our next
wave of salespeople. Eight years later, many of these early hires are
still with HubSpot serving in senior sales leadership roles.
“Must-have”
versus “nice-to-have” value propositions. In a strong
economy, “nice-to-have” value propositions can survive. Budgets
are plump. Spending barriers are relaxed. As a salesperson, it is not
overly challenging to “arm-twist” a friend or call in a favor to
make a sale.
In
a weak economy, “nice-to-have” value propositions are left to the
wayside. Unless the product or service solves a mission critical
issue at the buyer organization, no sale is made. A weak economy
forces an organization to discover their “must-have” value
proposition. For HubSpot, “more quality sales leads”— the value
proposition offered by our software — spurred even the most risk
averse organizations to open their purse strings. The 2008 financial
crisis pushed us to discover this “must-have” value proposition
early in our development, providing a strong foundation from which to
build.
Unit
economics versus unnatural growth. Over the past few years,
market valuations, both public and private, have rewarded growth over
unit economics. Historically, economic downturns have reversed the
situation.
Market
conditions in late 2008 forced us to re-focus HubSpot’s attention
to unit economics. Customer success, revenue churn, and customer
lifetime value often trumped conversations around revenue growth at
board and executive meetings. The sales team was at the heart of this
re-focusing effort. We began measuring salespeople based on the LTV
of their customers, not their revenue generation. We even aligned
sales commissions with unit economic metrics. Had we waited until we
were two, thee, or even four times the size, this transition would
have been exponentially harder – if not impossible. Our early focus
on unit economics laid a healthier foundation from which to scale
sales.
A
better work ethic. “Motivating the salesforce” has crept up
to be the top concern amongst sales leaders in recent market studies.
It can be harder to motivate salespeople in a strong economy. They
are constantly distracted with calls from outside recruiters, emails
from friends about new high-paying jobs, and stories about products
that are “selling themselves.”
In
a down economy, self-motivation comes much easier. Suddenly, the
recruiter calls offering lush salaries are replaced with horror
stories from friends witnessing massive layoffs and the inability to
find work. Employees and founders collectively realize an increased
urgency to succeed as they are the final mile in ensuring the early
stage venture survives financially.
Less
competition. In a strong economy, venture and angel capital are
flowing. Many people argue the supply of early stage capital in
strong economies exceeds the volume of good ideas and good startup
teams. This outcome is bad for everyone. Investors lose money on bad
deals. Customers lose money purchasing bad services. Entrepreneurs
attempting to create real value face distractions from bad
competition.
As
the market turned in 2008, we saw many of HubSpot’s early
competition fade away, due to lack of execution, a weak value
proposition, or both. The timing of this dynamic meant one less
obstacle for us as we navigated our growth phase. By the time the
capital markets bounced back, HubSpot had already established
barriers that made it difficult for new entrants to gain traction.
The
fate of the markets for the remainder of 2016 and beyond is yet to be
seen. However, as an entrepreneur entering the growth phase of your
business, reconsider whether a market turn is necessarily bad for
your business. It could be a blessing in disguise.