If you
have never read The Effective Executive, I recommend you put
it on your priority list, right now. Peter Drucker wrote The
Effective Executive in 1967, and it is just as relevant today as
it was then. Perhaps even more.
In the
book, Drucker explains the five facets of executive effectiveness.
For the purposes of this blog post, I will call your attention to
only one of those five dimensions. What I want to talk about is the
importance of individual strengths.
Chapter
Four, in The Effective Executive, is titled “Making
Strengths Productive.” In the chapter, Drucker talks about the
importance of identifying, and building on, your personal strengths.
Peter says effective executives are not omnipotent. In fact, an individual's strength is usually bundled with an equally great weakness.
There
are any number of things effective people are not good at.
But, this need not be a problem. All a person needs to do is
identify, and make productive, his or her unique strengths. Drucker
warns people to not waste time trying to fix their weaknesses. A much
more effective strategy is to utilize your strengths so that you may produce and contribute.
We have now arrived at a part that threw me for a loop. You see, some years ago Donald
Clifton started studying strengths as well. In fact, it was Clifton's
work that led the Gallup Organization to their current focus on
strengths.
Through
Gallup we all can take a strengths test to help us identify where
our talents lie. Gallup has identified 34 areas of potential
strength. So far, so good.
Unfortunately,
this is where things start to derail. The folks at Gallup would agree
with Drucker that it is wise to build on your strengths and ignore
your weaknesses. In fact, this is a common theme in modern
psychology.
Herein
lies the problem. One of Gallup's 34 talent “themes” is
Discipline. This got me to thinking, is discipline optional? I mean,
if you take the strengths finder test, and discover that you have
little natural discipline, can you simply ignore the importance of
discipline?
I
believe the answer to that question is, it depends. In order to live
a happy life, I believe you can operate with little discipline.
However, if you wish to be successful in business, I believe
discipline is not optional.
Business
is largely about productivity. And, as I wrote last week,
productivity is largely about discipline and self-control. Without
discipline it is virtually impossible to be very productive.
If it
were not for competition, productivity would be unnecessary. Of
course, as we all know, business is a competitive sport.
Undisciplined companies get their butts kicked by those who are
disciplined.
Some
years ago, Jim Collins made quite the splash with his book Good to Great. When Collins and his team analyzed what factors caused
good companies to evolve into great companies, one of the things they
found was a “culture of discipline.” That is to say, disciplined
people, with disciplined thinking, taking disciplined action. Like a lot of people, I did not
find the idea surprising.
So, to
answer my own question, no, I do not think discipline is optional. At
least not when it comes to effectiveness and entrepreneurship. I
imagine, in life generally, one could get along fine without
discipline. However, in the realm of business, I do not believe such
a luxury exists.
I guess the next question would be, “If discipline is so important, how do we develop it?” I think that is a good question. And, fortunately, a lot of research is being done on methods to improve discipline. It is this research, that I will touch on, at a later date. For now, I wish you a wonderful, disciplined week and a happy Memorial Day.
I guess the next question would be, “If discipline is so important, how do we develop it?” I think that is a good question. And, fortunately, a lot of research is being done on methods to improve discipline. It is this research, that I will touch on, at a later date. For now, I wish you a wonderful, disciplined week and a happy Memorial Day.